Brand conversation listening is important (obviously).
But simple, vague advice like “Listen to the conversation around your brand” and “Join the conversation” is inadequately qualified. I can find eggheads on Twitter who’ve tweeted these very platitudes. Without explanation, they’re worthless.
Listening vs. Eavesdropping
A brand that eavesdrops and replies to the most insignificant mentions interrupts the consumers’ conversation, instead of politely jumping in where it is useful. This is where social media becomes a time suck. Plus, actions speak louder than words. Imagine a nasty tweet about your brand from a Twitter complainer who has a major sense of entitlement post-this crazy time of brand democratization. You must be able to differentiate the bitching from the truly problematic:
Properly handled tweet worth a reply:
@everysandwich can you send us an email firstname.lastname@example.org so we can have this resolved for you
Waste of everyone’s time, please unjoin the conversation even though you’re amusing:
Goonies is only ranked 2 stars? F*** you Comcast. F*** you and your socialist rating system.
Comcast Sucks!!!! Verizon Fios not available in my area… This some bull!!!!
Rather than have a drawn-out public @ conversation which should shift to a DM conversation in the beginning, just take action if you think their complaint is valid. WWRDLD? (What Would Ramon De Leon Do?) The Chicago Dominos Pizza franchise owner became famous last year when he creatively apologized to a customer’s tweet about her pizza being late. When the complaint is legitimate, real action like that works. Fake action is tweeting a canned response, especially if it has exclamation points.